Friday, January 13, 2023
\\\ UNTIL DAYBREAK /// Radio Works//Radio Art by JEFF GBUREK in One Place Linkable
Tuesday, January 10, 2023
TIME (OF POETRY): TEXT & SCORE
prelude
VOICE:
( multiple delay echo effects, decay/repeat rates timed irregularly -
- 2 to 6 channels depending on spatial limits)
I AM HERE IN THE
PAST COMING TO MEET YOU
((THIS IS A RECORDING
AFTER ALL))
but this is ---- after all ---- more than
just a recording
IT IS A
p-lay-back
in another time
you
            are                                              you
approaching
who I do not know
to meet this
here
I don't know where
//: Time of Poetry ://
con com com
________________________________________________________/
______________________________________________________/ 
if the we could speak before the end
questions begin
"let time emit time"
     -- Benjamin Hollander (quoted from memory)
1)
if you took the line out of time
what would things sound like
what would sound like things you took
the line of time out if
too simply clever, inverted,
inadequately palindromic, so what
the time sound of things if out
would you the line took like
   (author's note: lines, phrases may be repeated, paused indefinitely, for reasons of clarification
or pacing, there is no rush ) 
utter nonsense nevertheless uttered
we need or require or demand or find imperative
in writing or narrative anyway some linear time
even if a hollywood bollywood chopped
time made linear eventually resolved
I sometimes feel all time present if you
only you
slowly speak
and memories whirl around the stillness point
point
              point 
why not let time show and sound itself?
2)
the lone as of what
speaking              BEING 
we admits break down
leak                         ALONE 
eeks across lineage
phono-etymological              AS IF  
subatomic literal to
the letter character clings           AS OF
slashed gently by gamma
rays, gaba receptors      in any langauge 
in which porosity,
gills, amino                                      AS SUCH   (wormhole here)
acids unused yet present in the polymerase chain,
any genome, structures us spatially we are several
akin   ----                                                lineages, codes
  sponge,                                          contracts, expands
skeletal,
extra
isochronic distributions, gapped end rhymes
oh why not simply say we made of words time
why crack correct order why correct cracks
call a spade look who's calling the kettle black
you can speak peace with a broken arrow
ending the civil war but not what the war was over
that arrow splits the same all the time falls in ripples
the animal's claws retractable
from the telos the target unreachable
3)
perhaps it's better therefore we think there are multiple lines
& time is rather some convergence of vectors
not a unitary trajectory snapped to mechanically by quanta
time as a repeated point
point point
point point
              [point]   {[point]} 
appearing variously in focus space
Q: what is "focus space"?
poets would answer: the poems
but nobody believes them
A: focus space is an ambience arbitrarily
bordered by clusters of sensible
points (of convergence)
that won't simply fit
any singularity
4) 
in a recent study of how we can use common kitchen devices to track gamma rays
that crash through the ionospheres 4 layers fragmenting into nano-particles,
the most stable of which is the muon whose life can be as long as (find figure)
the most stable of which is the muon whose life can be as long as
using common kitchen devices to track gamma rays 
we discover that our attention is being drawn to a particle that approaches the speed of light
and our attention following the particle must also accelerate ever so briefly
but significantly towards that being as it warps the frame of time
since anyone moving closer to the speed of life begins to experience time as slowing down
and while the muon is being reabsorbed into more stable flows of matter
our consciousness is lifted outside of it's normal rate of framing time
we may even forget about time while creating the intensity of focus to
see things that are unusual, to see things normally unseen
i compare this to reading the line of a poem more than once
to catch up with the several meanings written into the one
written into the one
about this:
   I  thought it might be good to add some other sound layers but 
that would only make the intelligibility of the text problem worse for the listener 
who tends to want to grab after sense rather than surrender to sound. It's a tough call. if I ignore the need for sense, then 
it has an almost inviolable sense of music. I shift between several 
different delay patches to create dislocations and rupture. if the 
listener understands that these are the elements I am playing with, then
 they can just dig that and listen to it like some astrophysicist 
scat-singing. the real trouble for me personally is that the 
studies I've undertaken in relation to this topic since then have caused
 a shift in my own sense of how crucial it is to understand and act with
 the sense quantum mechanics is part of how the universe actually 
functions (to take it seriously, not simply as a crackpot lunatic theory). and 
that only underlines and brings into relief the concept I set out to 
explore with this piece: that you cannot have the discrete without the 
continuous (that's like Whiteheadean language for it) or the particle 
without the wave function, the electron in a position without the cloud 
of probable simultaneous unknown positions, the actual undecidability of
 a ground state versus an intervention which causes the phenomenon to be
 shaped by observation. it all summons huge multiple questions 
concerning how we interact with the natural world in fact and in some 
sense wanting to feel like the earth's environment is quantifiable as a resource
 turns out to be the main animus/fuel for the anthropcentric 
anthropocene. the more I listened to the piece the more I realized that 
my editorial consciousness was trying to narrow and restore a linearity I
 don't really believe in: I was trying to force meaning and position 
against my own attempts to create a piece that avoided all that. and 
yet, I still wondered how I might make it more engaging and less 
frustrating to the person unfamiliar with me or these hard questions. in
 the final moments before I sent it, I realized it kind of means I
 should make a different kind of presentation. at the same time, I 
figured there is nothing wrong with letting this one fly. it's always 
the same: some will love it and others will be baffled or just hate it. 
so, it's like that. I will certainly listen to your reflections on the 
thing. 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
